Donald Trump Reaches Deal To Keep Name On Taj Mahal

rx onlinediv>

The Trump Taj Mahal will continue to bear that true name, as Donald Trump arrived to an agreement with Carl Icahn over maintaining their family members name on the resort.

The Trump Taj Mahal will still be known by that name for the foreseeable future, ending an attempt by Donald Trump to just take their name off of the resort that is beleaguered.

Trump and investor Carl Icahn reached an agreement that will see the Trump name stay on the casino, despite previous indications from the Trump household which they desired nothing to do with the resort or Atlantic City.

‘I am happy to have reached a handle Carl, a person who I have great respect for both personally and professionally,’ Trump said in a declaration. ‘The Trump Taj Mahal, under the leadership that is right with the proposed significant reinvestment in the property, can be, once again, a wonderful place for travel and entertainment.’

Trump Fought to Have Name Eliminated

The agreement comes after an ongoing appropriate battle over whether or not the Trump family could sue to possess their name removed from the resort. Last month, a federal judge agreed that they could move forward along with their lawsuit; last week, the casino filed a selling point of that decision. Trump, together with his child Ivanka, was already successful in removing his title from the Trump that is former Plaza which can be now closed.

Trump Entertainment Resorts, which operates the casino, argued in a court filing that the Trump name was too ‘iconic’ to reduce, calling the name ‘an invaluable asset.’ Donald Trump no longer runs Trump Entertainment Resorts, though he does hold a 10 % stake into the company.

Since their removal from the operation of this company, Trump has consistently made it clear he does not wish to be associated with Atlantic City that he is not associated with the casinos, and.

The Trumps had argued that Trump Entertainment had allowed the 2 casinos which used the Trump title to fall into disrepair in the last few years. This, they stated, damaged their brand that is personal to their desire to separate the family name from the casinos.

The deal will have to be approved by a federal bankruptcy court judge like so many other aspects of the ongoing saga at the Trump Taj Mahal. The Trump Taj Mahal can be embroiled in a dispute with union workers, that are now headed to an appeals court. That legal battle hinges in the Trump Taj Mahal’s choice to split agreements with the United Here neighborhood 54 union, which a bankruptcy court authorized. The union says that the bankruptcy court lacked the jurisdiction to make that choice.

Trump Taj Mahal fined $10 Million for Violating Bank Secrecy Act

The contract comes just days after the Trump Taj Mahal had been fined $10 million by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for repeated violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). FinCEN had purchased the casino to make regular external audits to make sure its conformity with cash laundering statutes, and the casino admitted to violating many of the demands regarding the BSA.

‘Trump Taj Mahal received warnings that are many its inadequacies,’ FinCEN Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery said. ‘Like all casinos in this nation, Trump Taj Mahal has a duty to greatly help protect our system that is financial from exploited by criminals, terrorists, and other bad actors. Far from meeting these expectations, poor compliance methods, over several years, left the casino and our monetary system unacceptably exposed.’

Foxwoods Makes Bid For Final Massachusetts Casino License

Foxwoods is hoping to snag the Massachusetts that is final casino by partnering with KG Urban Enterprises. (Image:

Foxwoods includes a lot to be concerned about regarding the Massachusetts gambling enterprises that are being constructed within the next few years.

After all, a lot of business for the Connecticut resort comes from Massachusetts, and it’s likely that many of those visitors will always be at house once MGM and Wynn develop their complexes that are own Springfield and Everett, respectively.

And with no chance to stop those Massachusetts casinos from being built, Foxwoods is attempting one final time to grab an item of that cake for on their own.

Foxwoods Lovers with KG Urban

Foxwoods, owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Indian tribe, has officially entered into an understanding to work with KG Urban Enterprises for a proposition for the final Massachusetts casino permit. A letter was signed by the operator of intent to utilize KG Urban on a casino in New Bedford. Previously, Foxwoods had shown an interest that is potential building a casino in Fall River, another location in the southeastern Massachusetts region, the one part of the declare that has yet to possess its license awarded.

‘We couldn’t have discovered a better choice for an operator,’ KG Urban Managing Director Andrew M. Stern said in a declaration. ‘No one knows the Massachusetts and New England local market better than the Mashantucket.’

This isn’t the first time Foxwoods has shown an interest in building within the state, however. Foxwoods was among the contenders that are early the Boston area casino license as well, proposing a casino in Milford that has been ultimately defeated by the town’s voters before it might even be viewed by state regulators.

Interestingly, the final casino battle in Massachusetts will pit Foxwoods against one of its former allies. Whenever trying to build in Milford, Foxwoods partnered with Crossroads Massachusetts. That developer has become section of group trying to propose a casino in Somerset. There’s additionally a third bid that is strong the Brockton Fairgrounds, where owner George Carney is working with Rush Street Gaming so that you can bring a casino to that particular city.

Mayor’s Help for Casino Questioned

Foxwoods and KG Urban may face other hurdles as well. It seems that New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell is not pleased with the proposal, needing concessions through the designers and asking for a redesign of this proposed casino.

‘ At this true point, we are not yes we will come to agreement with this mayor,’ said Andrew Paven, a spokesperson for KG Urban.

However, Mayor Mitchell’s own terms sounded a tad bit more welcoming to the casino, if not extremely enthusiastic.

‘We are in discussions with the developer about whether a casino is reasonable at the proposed site,’ Mitchell said in a statement. ‘The city would be ready to help a casino proposal provided that, on stability, it advances the city’s long-lasting economic interests.’

So far, Massachusetts regulators have actually approved three gambling venues in the state. In Western Massachusetts, MGM won the directly to build in Springfield with no significant opposition in the later phases of the procedure. Conversely, the Greater Boston license featured a tough battle between Wynn Resorts, which wanted to build in Everett, and Mohegan Sun, which partnered with Suffolk Downs in an attempt to place a resort in Revere. Regulators ultimately picked the Everett task despite objections from the city of Boston. The state has also approved a slot parlor which is put in Plainville and operated by Penn National Gaming.

Connecticut Tribes Band Together In New Push For Expanded Gambling

Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods are teaming up in an effort to persuade Connecticut allowing for expanded gambling. (Image:

Expanded gambling in Connecticut was likely to be dead a month ago. But the proposition seems more alive than in the past, as both Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods are lobbying hard to get the state legislature to at the least think about the measure as a way to combat the new casinos that are being built in neighboring Massachusetts.

It’s unclear what the Mohegans and Mashantucket Pequots, the 2 tribes that operate the Native American casinos in Connecticut, would ask for or find a way to get from state lawmakers.

It could be something as extensive as being a brand brand new casino in northern area of the suggest that would attempt to convince state residents maybe not traveling to Massachusetts when gambling enterprises are built there, or it could be an even more modest proposal to add slot machines to off-track betting locations.

Officials, Lawmakers Speak Vaguely of Gambling Expansion

‘We’re speaking about ways to preserve jobs,’ said Mashantucket Pequot chairman Rodney Butler, he or the tribe were planning though he did not specify exactly what. Butler and Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority chairman Kevin Brown traveled together last Wednesday to satisfy with Democratic leaders in Connecticut’s Senate.

‘we view them as a significant employer in our state,’ said Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk), who a month ago declared their efforts dead but admitted to meeting with all the tribal leaders last week. Like other people, Duff provided details that are few exactly what anyone was proposing.

Regardless of the lack of concrete proposals being floated publically, there are indications that at the least some officials prepare to simply help the tribes battle against increasing competition in the area.

‘The gaming industry never goes away,’ said State Representative Stephen Dargan Haven that is(D-West) who claims the Public Safety and Security Committee that he chairs is prone to approve some sort of gambling expansion bill by way of a March 19 deadline. ‘It’s always an interesting topic.’

The sudden increase in chatter round the casino industry employs last Wednesday’s release of the Northeastern Casino Gaming scientific study’s update that is latest. In line with the group’s most report that is recent Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun has seen both their revenues and their employment rolls shrink by a lot more than 35 percent since 2006, whenever gambling enterprises were at their peaks. The combined revenue for the two casinos was just $1.9 billion final year, down from $3.2 billion in 2006.

Governor Acknowledges Problem, It Isn’t Taking Sides

Even Governor Dannel Malloy ended up being willing to talk about the chance of expanded gambling in his state, though he was careful not to have a place on the issue.

‘This is not my proposal,’ Malloy thought to reporters while at the Mohegan Sun casino. ‘Other individuals are making it. I’m not saying no, I’m not saying yet.’

Malloy additionally acknowledged that the tribes will probably need to do something when the MGM Springfield casino opens, that is anticipated to happen in 2017.

‘Whether it’s nuclear or not, clearly gaming is becoming ubiquitous,’ Malloy stated. ‘So when you’ve got a state on your northern border that is going to have at the very least six establishments, that is an issue. When Rhode Island improves their facilities, that’s a problem. I believe the tribal nations have said, ‘Hey, we think this is an option to handle that.”